site stats

Alita vs ca case digest

WebPEOPLE V SARCIA. G.R. NO. 169641, 10 SEPTEMBER 2009, 599 SCRA 20. PONENTE: Leonardo-De Castro, J. COURT DECIDING: Supreme Court En Banc. RELIEF: This is a review on the CA decision (CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 00717) which affirmed, with modification the decision of Regional Trial Court of Ligao City. DOCTRINE: Acts Contrary to Law- … WebOriginal Title: Alita vs CA Uploaded by Kitem Kadatuan Jr. Description: Alita vs CA Full description of 1 Reward Your Curiosity Everything you want to read. Anytime. Anywhere. Any device. No Commitment. Cancel anytime. Unlock the full document with a free trial! Continue Reading with Trial

Santiago Vs Ortiz-Luis PDF Justice Crime & Violence - Scribd

WebALITA vs CA , G.R. No. 78517 February 27, 1989 - Case Digest GABINO ALITA, JESUS JULIAN, JR., JESUS JULIAN, SR., PEDRO RICALDE, VICENTE RICALDE and … WebFeb 27, 1989 · Case Digest: Alita v. CA G.R. No. 78517,Feb 27, 1989, 170 SCRA 706 (1989) The subject matter of the case consists of two (2) parcels of land, acquired by … think in american english https://robina-int.com

Daez V CA Case Digest PDF - Scribd

WebPetitioners ("private petitioners") in G.R. No. 132759 are all residents of Lubao, Pampanga, claiming to be cultivating a vast landholding owned by the heirs of Teodorica Reinares Arrastia, Leticia Arrastia Montenegro and Juanita Arrastia ("Arrastia heirs"). Said property has an aggregate area of approximately three hundred (300) hectares and ... WebSumulong v. Guerrero 154 SCRA 461 (1987) Facts: On December 5, 1977, the National Housing Authority filed a complaint for the expropriation of 25 hectares of land in Antipolo, Rizal pursuant to PD 1224 authorizing the expropriation of private lands for socialized housing. Among those lands sought to be expropriated are the petitioners'' lands. WebALITA VS CA FACTS The subject matter of the case consists of two (2) parcels of land, acquired by private respondents' predecessors-in-interest through homestead patent under the provisions of Commonwealth Act. … think in another word

Daez V CA Case Digest PDF - Scribd

Category:Case Digest: Province of Camarines Sur vs CA G.R. No. 103125, …

Tags:Alita vs ca case digest

Alita vs ca case digest

G.R. No. 78517 February 27, 1989 - GABINO ALITA, ET AL. v.

WebDefendants Alita filed their answer with special and affirmative defenses.-July 19, 1982: Reyes filed urgent motion to enjoin the defendants from declaring the lands in litigation under Operation Land Transfer and from being issued land transfer certificates-November 5, 1982: Court of Agrarian Relations 16th Regional District, Branch IV, Pagadian … WebAdd TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to ... c6950} Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS. Please …

Alita vs ca case digest

Did you know?

Web(DAEZ v CA- Case digest) (DAEZ v CA- Case digest) Julie. Alita vs CA GR 78517. Alita vs CA GR 78517. Ric Sayson. 8.G.R. No. 133507-325 SCRA 856. 8.G.R. No. 133507-325 SCRA 856. ... Alita v CA Digest. Apple Lentejas - Quevedo. Gr No 154654 Aguila. Gr No 154654 Aguila. Jo Paraggua. 111. 111. walalang. AGRA 3. AGRA 3. vienuell aying. Case … WebAlita v. CA -petition seeking the reversal Court of Appeals decision: 1)Declaring Presidential Decree No. 27 inapplicable to lands obtained thru the homestead law; 2) Declaring that …

WebAlita vs. CA Facts: Reyes (private respondent) predecessors acquired 2 parcels of land through a Homestead Patent under CA 141. It is located in Gullian, Tungawan, Zamboanga Del Sur. Reyes is personally cultivating the land but Alita does not want to vacate pursuant to P.D. 27 and P.D. 316 and regulations issued by Weblaw agrarian and social legislation cases chapter heirs of luna vs. afable, no. 188299 (january 23, 2013), 702 phil. 146 association of small landowners in the ... Corporation LAW CASE Digest PART 1; ... Alita vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. …

WebDec 17, 1999 · On July 27, 1987, the Congress of the Philippines formally convened and took over legislative power from the President. 2 This Congress passed Republic Act No. 6657, the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL) of 1988. The Act was signed by the President on June 10, 1988 and took effect on June 15, 1988. WebPurificacion Alarcon vs. Hon. Abdulwahid Bidin et al FACTS: In 1923, Roberto Alarcon leased a property with TCT No. T-13,125 (0-9493) to Esteban Sergas. On January 5, 1926, Roberto Alarcon sold a portion of his undivided share to Sergas. The date of instrument was January 5, 1926 but the inscription was on May 3, 1963.

WebDaez v CA. Facts: Eudosia Daez was the owner of a 4.1685-hectare riceland in Barangay Lawa, Meycauayan, Bulacan which was being cultivated by respondents Macario Soriente, Rogelio Macatulad, Apolonio Mediana and Manuel Umali under a system of share-tenancy. The said land was subjected to the Operation Land Transfer Program under Presidential …

WebDefendants Alita filed their answer with special and affirmative defenses.-July 19, 1982: Reyes filed urgent motion to enjoin the defendants from declaring the lands in litigation … think in beautyWebOn November 5, 1982, the then Court of Agrarian Relations 16th Regional District, Branch IV, Pagadian City (now Regional Trial Court, 9th Judicial Region, Branch XVIII) rendered … think in a certain wayWebOn July 19, 1982, plaintiffs filed an urgent motion to enjoin the defendants from declaring the lands in litigation under Operation Land Transfer from being issued land transfer certificates to which the defendants filed their opposition and the motion to … think in big picture termsWeb380481405 Spouses OMAR Moshiera Latip v Rosalie CHUA CASE Digest; Other related documents. Complaint - Sample format; Contract TO SELL Pallasigue-remedial-case-digest; ... 1993, petitioner filed with the Court of Appeals CA-G. SP No. 32484. It questioned the expropriation of its properties under the CARL and the denial of due process in the ... think in a box san angelo txWebALITA VS COURT OF APPEALS 170 SCRA 706, 1989 FACTS: This is a petition seeking the reversal of the decision rendered by the respondent Court of Appeals on March 3, 1987 affirming the judgment of the court declaring that Presidential Decree No. 27 is inapplicable to lands obtained thru the homestead law; think in big picturethink in big-picture termsWebPART XI Land Bank vs CA - SOCIAL LEGISLATION CASES - DIGESTS; Laguna LAKE VS CA - SOCIAL LEGISLATION CASES - DIGESTS; Civil Code (Contracts) Arts. 1361-1370 ( Summary) ... Alita v. CA, GR No. 78517, February 27, Milestone Farms, Inc., v. Office of the President, GR No. 182332, Feb 23, think in asl